
The
rules governing the public's rights to examine and make copies of local government
accounts are profiled in this section.
|

News
Items, Investigations & Exposés

July 2010: The Court of Appeal has been tasked to decide whether
UK taxpayers and voters (including journalists) are free to view, copy and then
publicise details of Town Hall finances. Lords
Justice Rix, Jackson and Etherton are to judge whether the Audit Commission Act
(a law which permits the public to trawl through local govt accounts each summer)
must be tightened up, to enable councils and consultants to keep 'confidential'
contracts and invoices out of public view. The court is also to rule whether
taxpayers and voters (including journalists) should be prohibited from disclosing
any information inspected and copied to any individual or organisation other than
a nominated district auditor - who will determine what information can be made
public. More details of court submissions
here. |
July 2010: Media obtain details of Spa project Journalists
at the Bath Chronicle accessed the accounts to uncover hitherto confidential costs
of a building project in the town. More details here. |
February 2010: Court of Appeal fixes Veolia hearing Waste
management firm Veolia ES Nottinghamshire's battle to keep details of a multi-million
pound PFI project out of public scrutiny (see stories below) is heading to the
Court of Appeal. The hearing is scheduled for 5 July 2010. Details will
be updated. |
October 2009: Veolia appeals High Court ruling
Waste management firm Veolia ES Nottinghamshire has lodged a formal appeal against
a High Court ruling ordering disclosure of financial details of a multi-million
pound PFI incinerator project. The company, which took judicial review proceedings
to stop Nottinghamshire county council releasing parts of a contract and monthly
invoices to local campaigner Shlomo Dowen (pictured below), has filed papers with
the Court of Appeal. It is understood that the company intends to argue that
commercial confidentiality interests over-ride the taxpayers' rights to peruse
the disputed accounts. Mr Justice Cranston rejected Veolia's case in the High
Court hearing earlier this month, and ordered the council to provide Mr Dowen
with access to the files. An appeal hearing date is pending. |
October 2009: High Court rules against Veolia on 'commercial confidentiality
deal' The High Court has rejected an attempt by environmental
company Veolia to keep details of a major PFI deal under wraps. The company,
which is operating an incinerator site near Sherwood Forest, Notts, has been told
it can not prevent Friends of the Earth campaigner Shlomo Dowen (pictured) from
inspecting last year's PFI invoices and contracts at his local county council.
 |
Veolia argued that its commercial interests would be damaged if there was disclosure,
as part of the recent annual public audit of accounts. But Judge Cranston said
Parliament had established a clear right for the public to view such files. For
a summary of the judgement, click here. |
|
September 2009: Council leader claimed double London hotel allowance
from taxpayer Conservative council leader Martin
Hill (pictured) claimed £292 for an overnight stay at a luxury London hotel,
so that he could "network" with other councillors. Orchard News
Bureau Ltd discovered the politician omitted to seek permission from Lincolnshire
County Council before booking accommodation and submitting the claim -
 |
which was more than twice the £130 London overnight stay rate permitted
in the authority's own financial regulations. Hill took a room at the Intercontinental
Hotel in Park Lane, Mayfair, after attending a regional planning conference in
the capital earlier in the day. |
Finance officials initially queried the invoice, before being instructed to pay
out. The council issued a statement saying Hill's claim was approved because
he had wanted to spend more time "networking" with other councillors.
For more on the story, see the Rotten Boroughs section of issue #1245 of Private
Eye. |
|
August 2009: High Court hearing on 'commercial confidentiality deal' Judgment
is pending over an attempt by environmental firm Veolia to stop a council releasing
details of a PFI deal which cost £21m last year. The company issued legal
proceedings after Nottinghamshire taxpayer and campaigner Shlomo Dowen (pictured
above) requested access to financial files, using his audit act inspection rights.
At a hearing earlier this week, Veolia argued its contract and monthly invoices
were not covered by legislation requiring accounts to be opened to public inspection.
The company also argued that its itemised fees were commercially sensitive and
confidential, and should not be disclosed to taxpayers, sub-contractors or rival
firms. Mr Justice Cranston is reserving his decision. For a summary of Counsels'
submissions at the hearing, click here. |
|
August 2009: Tory politician tight-lipped over late-night phone calls,
charged to taxpayer Conservative councillor Pauline
Watson (pictured) is in hot water after leaving Lincolnshire taxpayers with a
bill running close to £1,000, for regular late-night calls to a mobile number.
Orchard News Bureau Ltd discovered the politician's extravagent use of a dedicated,
county council-funded phone line - supposedly provided for constituency business
- after inspecting bills under the audit regulations.
 |
The council paid the quarterly demands without checking full details with BT.
Councillor Watson, who represents Louth, refused to answer any questions from
ONB. For more on the story, see the Rotten Boroughs section of issue #1243
of Private Eye. | Update:
(15 July 2010): ONB has obtained a copy of a receipt
showing Cllr Watson repaid £452 from her expenses in August 2009, following
contact from ONB and a meeting with council officials. |
August 2009: London paper wins Town Hall 'battle' A
London journalist has revealed details of elected councillors' expenses and travel
claims, after what her editor describes as 'a week long battle for the truth'. In
her weekly comment column, Hounslow and Brentford Times editor Helen Barnes said:
'Despite it being a criminal offence to obstruct access, Hounslow chiefs came
very close to doing just that. For days, this newspaper had to fight for access
to Hounslow's accounts.' Reporter Lucy Buckland finally succeeded in obtaining
access to the files - which produced a double page story about 'extravagent meals',
'luxurious hotel bookings' and flights run up by elected members.
| This
story was published by the Hounslow and Brentford Times and also features on the
Hold The Front
Page website. |
|
From
the archives: PA correspondent forces Met to reveal payouts to informants The
Metropolitan Police released hitherto secret details of payments to registered
informants after a journalist filed an audit inspection enquiry. The force
had previously refused to disclose costs in response to FOI requests. Press
Association crime correspondent Chris Greenwood instead requested details under
the audit act, after reading an article by ONB director Richard Orange in trade
magazine Press
 |
Gazette, outling taxpayers' rights to examine the accounts. After some reluctant
and erroneous references to the Official Secrets Act, the Metropolitan Police
Authority provided Greenwood with access to the files on the final day of the
inspection. This story was published by Press
Gazette in September 2007 |
|
From
the archives: 'You're hired!' - by email Management
consultant and stand-in council CEO Jan Didrichsen (pictured) hired a spin doctor
on a lucrative two-year deal which cost council taxpayers more than £200,000. PR
'guru' Mark Fletcher Brown charged £850 a day to advise Lincolnshire county
council's politicians and officials on how to improve the authority's public 'image'.
Didrichsen, who continued to run his Yorkshire business while working as the
council's head of paid service, engaged the PR consultant in a friendly-worded
email exchange.
 | ONB
discovered the council failed to draw up a formal written contract for much of
Fletcher Brown's first year in situ, and had not followed audit rules requiring
a record to be kept of why the work had not been put out to tender. This
story was first published by ONB in August 2006 |
|
From
the archives: Council broke audit rules for email 'masterclasses' A
consultancy was paid more than £14,000 of taxpayers' money to give a handful
of council staff a series of 'clinics' on how to write, send and store email messages. ONB's
checks with Companies House revealed that the London firm involved was set up
a week before the deal was struck, and then closed down a week after the contract
ended.
Lincolnshire county council breached its own audit rules by awarding the contract,
without seeking quotes from alternative companies, or keeping proper written records
detailing the reasons for not doing so. This
story was first published by ONB in August 2006 |
|
From
the archives: Licensed to bill Journalists
from the Newark Advertiser spent two days at Nottinghamshire County Council's
offices, checking bills and invoices relating to elected members' expense claims.
The newspaper revealed that Councillor Colin Bromfield had followed up three foreign
trips on council business to Russia, with dozens of calls on a council-supplied
mobile phone, including calls at 5am local time, over the Christmas period. The
inquiry also revealed that the Newark councillor had submitted expenses claims
for attending meetings in Nottingham and Newcastle, on the same day. The newspaper
quoted the councillor saying he was passing on festive greetings to Russian contacts,
and that he had made a mistake with the exact times on his travel expenses claim. This
story was published by the Advertiser in August 2004 |
|
This
web page is updated periodically. Please check back for additional information.
For guidance, contact Orchard News Bureau Ltd. |
|